Today, we’re excited to share research from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ‘From Shadows to Light,’ which presents an innovative swarm robotics approach where nano-drones autonomously track dynamic sources indoors.
Motivation
In dynamic and unpredictable indoor environments, locating moving sources—such as heat, gas, or light—presents unique challenges. GPS-denied settings, in particular, demand innovative and efficient onboard solutions for both control and sensing. Our research demonstrates how small drones, like Crazyflies, can be organized into a coordinated swarm to autonomously locate and follow these sources indoors, relying solely on onboard sensing and communication capabilities. Without sharing individual measurements, each drone adapts its behavior in response to its own sensor readings, allowing the swarm to collectively converge on the center of a light source through modified interactions with nearby agents.
Method
Our approach enables each Crazyflie to function autonomously, using onboard sensing combined with continuous inter-agent communication at a frequency of 20 Hz. This methodology is structured around three core components:
Proximal Control and Collective Motion
Each drone broadcasts its position to nearby agents, enabling the calculation of relative positions to maintain safe distances. This proximal control ensures cohesive group movement by computing virtual force vectors for velocity commands, which are sent to onboard controllers operating at 20 Hz.
Source Seeking Through Adaptive Social Proximity
Drones use custom light sensors to detect local light intensity. Instead of directly adjusting positions based on this measurement, each drone modifies its social proximity to neighbors according to the sensed intensity without broadcasting this information. This adaptation allows the swarm to collectively follow the light gradient toward the source in a decentralized manner.
Obstacle Avoidance
Equipped with time-of-flight sensors, each drone independently detects obstacles and adjusts its trajectory to maintain safety. This ensures the swarm remains intact while navigating toward the source.
By combining continuous relative positioning, virtual force-based control, individual sensing, and adaptive social behavior, our methodology provides a robust framework for efficient source seeking in GPS-denied indoor environments.
Experimental Setup
Crazyflie equipped with Flow Deck v2, UWB Deck, Multi-Ranger Deck, and a custom-made deck that produces an analog voltage reading from an LDR for light intensity measurements.
The system architecture allowing us to achieve autonomous flocking and source localization with a swarm of Crazyflie
Our experiments take place in a 7×4.75-meter indoor arena with remotely controlled overhead light bulbs. These bulbs, activated individually or in pairs, create a moving light gradient. We tested our flocking swarm by initially positioning them at the edge of an illuminated area. As the light source shifted, we assessed the swarm’s performance by comparing their trajectories with the known centers of the illuminated areas without waiting for full convergence at each step. We also mapped our environment’s light intensity by moving a single Crazyflie randomly around the flight arena and recording the measurements to later merge on a single map to generate this light intensity heatmap.
The brightness values around the test environments, measured for each light source when only it was active.
Results
The flock flies as an ordered swarm, successfully localizing around the source with the swarm’s centroid positioned at the source center. (The centroid appears as a point without an arrow in the video.)
Even with an obstacle present within or between the illuminated regions, the flock successfully localizes around the center, avoiding the obstacle and maintaining order and cohesion within the swarm. The Multi-Ranger deck provides distance measurements for obstacle detection.
Future Directions
As the next step, we plan to apply our highly generalizable algorithm to various source types, including gas sources, radio signals, and similar sources that provide only scalar strength measurements rather than directional cues. Additionally, we have demonstrated that our flocking and source localization algorithms work effectively in 3D. We aim to showcase a fully functional application with a 3D-localized source and a flocking swarm operating in 3D space. Finally, we are working toward achieving fully onboard relative localization, which would eliminate the need for any indoor positioning system. This advancement would allow our swarm to operate autonomously in any environment, replicating the same behavior wherever it is deployed.
The authors were with the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Please feel free to contact us with any questions or ideas: t.a.karaguzel@vu.nl
Please cite this as:
@ARTICLE{10314746,
author={Karagüzel, Tugay Alperen and Retamal, Victor and Cambier, Nicolas and Ferrante, Eliseo},
journal={IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters},
title={From Shadows to Light: A Swarm Robotics Approach With Onboard Control for Seeking Dynamic Sources in Constrained Environments},
year={2024},
volume={9},
number={1},
pages={127-134},
keywords={Robot sensing systems;Autonomous aerial vehicles;Position measurement;Vehicle dynamics;Sensors;Location awareness;Drones;Swarm robotics;aerial systems: perception and autonomy;multi-robot systems},
doi={10.1109/LRA.2023.3331897}}
We are excited to announce that we are working on several new link performance metrics for the Crazyflie that will simplify the troubleshooting of communication issues. Until now, users have had access to very limited information about communication links, relying primarily on a “link quality” statistic based on packet retries (when we have to re-send data) and an RSSI channel scan. Our nightly tests have been limited to basic bandwidth and latency testing. With this update, we aim to expose richer data that not only enables users to make more informed decisions regarding communication links but also enhances the effectiveness of our nightly testing process. In this blog post, we will explore the new metrics, the rationale behind their introduction, and how they will improve your interaction with the Crazyflie. Additionally, we will be holding a developer meeting on Wednesday November 13th to discuss these updates in more detail, and we encourage you to join us!
“Link Quality”—All or Nothing
Until now, users of the Crazyflie have had access to a single link quality metric. Implemented in the Python library, this metric is based on packet retries—instances when data packets need to be re-sent due to communication issues. This metric indicates that for every retry, the link quality drops by 10%, with a maximum of 3 retries allowed. As a result, the link quality score usually ranges from 70% to 100%, with a drop to 0% when communication is completely lost. However, as packet loss occurs, users often experience a steep decline, commonly seeing 100% when packets are successfully acknowledged or dropping to 0% when communication is completely lost.
The current link quality metric has served as a basic indicator but provides limited insight, often making it difficult to gauge communication reliability accurately. Recognizing these limitations, we’re introducing several new link performance metrics to the Crazyflie Python library, designed to provide a far more detailed and actionable view of communication performance.
What’s Coming in the Upcoming Update
The first metric we are adding is latency. We measure the full link latency, capturing the round-trip time through the library, to the Crazyflie, and back. This latency measurement is link-independent, meaning it applies to both radio and USB connections. The latency metric exposed to users will reflect the 95th percentile—a commonly used measure for capturing typical latency under normal conditions.
Next are several metrics that (currently) only support the radio link. For these, we distinguish between uplink (from the radio to the Crazyflie) and downlink (from the Crazyflie to the radio).
The first is packet rate, which simply measures the number of packets sent and received per second.
More interestingly, we are introducing a link congestion metric. Whenever there is no data to send, both the radio and the Crazyflie send “null” packets. By calculating the ratio of null packets to the total packets sent or received, we can estimate congestion. This is particularly useful for users who rely heavily on logging parameters or, for example, stream mocap positioning data to the Crazyflie.
The Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) measures the quality of signal reception. Unlike our current “link quality” metric, we hope that a poor RSSI will serve as an early warning signal for potential communication loss. While RSSI tracking has been possible before with the channel scan example, this update will monitor RSSI in the library by default, and expose it to the user. The nRF firmware will also be updated to report RSSI by default. Currently, we only receive uplink RSSI, that is, RSSI measured on the Crazyflie side.
We’ve already found these new metrics invaluable at Bitcraze. While we have, of course, measured various parameters throughout development, it was easy to lose track of the precise status of the communication stack. In the past, we relied more on general impressions of performance, but with these new metrics, we’ve gained a clearer picture. They’ve already shed light on areas like swarm latency, helping us fine-tune and understand performance far better than before.
You can follow progress on GitHub, and we invite you to try out these metrics for yourself. If there’s anything you feel is missing, or if you have feedback on what would make these tools even more helpful, we’d love to hear from you. Hit us up over on GitHub or join the developer meeting on Wednesday the 13th of November (see the join information on discussions).
We are happy to announce that release 2024.10 is now available! Special thanks to our community contributors for their valuable input and code contributions in this release!
Ever since we started going to fairs to show off the Crazyflies, we’ve been trying to push the boundaries for the demos. Often we’ve used the fairs as an opportunity to either develop new functionality or try out new ideas. Something we’ve always been interested in, especially for fairs, is autonomous flights. It’s hard to talk to people about the Crazyflie while trying to fly it at the same time. Back in 2015 we were using the Kinect for piloting the Crazyflie at the Bay Area Maker Faire. Although awesome, we had a slight issue: we needed to switch batteries on the Crazyflie each flight. We had a Qi deck for wireless charging but no positioning system good enough to use it for landing on a charger.
Latest iteration of the Crazyflie Brushless charger
In 2018 we were really excited when we got to borrow a motion capture system from Qualisys and could finally land on a Qi charger (3D printed base and an IKEA Qi charger). First time we showed this off was at IROS in Madrid 2018. The following year we improved the demo to have more Crazyflies and switched to the Lighthouse positioning system at ICRA 2019. Since then each year we have been improving the demo until we’ve reached the current state we showed off at IROS 2022 in Kyoto.
So since 2018 we’ve been using the Qi wireless charging for our demos. Many customers have purchased the Qi charging deck, but building a matching charging platform has always required some effort. So, a while back we started looking at something that could replace the Qi deck, with a lighter solution which would also allow users to have other decks with electronics facing downwards. The first prototypes were made with the Crazyflie 2.1 back in 2021 using decks, but they were a bit clumsy. For one thing you needed the charging solution to be integrated on each deck.
When work started on the Crazyflie Brushless we realized we had the possibility to integrate the charge points directly on the main PCB which meant we could still use any decks we wanted and get the charging. So the prototypes from 2021 were reshaped into something we could use with the Crazyflie Brushless. Although the prototypes worked well, they were pretty big and packed with features which weren’t needed for charging (like LED lights and WiFi). Another iteration and the chargers have now gone down in size and complexity. The latest iteration only has charging and is powered via our 12V power block or 5V USB-C.
Over the years lots of customers have asked us for buying the Qi charger, since many users do not have the capabilities to build their own. Unfortunately we’ve never gotten around to it, but with the release of the Crazyflie Brushless we would like to change this. The release is only a few months away so we’re short on time for remaking the design so it’s usable for plastic molding. Instead the plan is to make a limited amount of prototypes available to our users, based on the same 3D printed design and electronics we’re currently using in our flight lab, at the time of release. This will enable our users to easily try out the design and create their own autonomous demos which will keep flying for a long time.
As you might expect, we use the Crazyflie python client a lot at Bitcraze. The client has a lot of features, ranging from setting up LPS/Lighthouse systems to turning on/off the headlight LEDs on the LED-ring deck. But some of the features we use the most is probably the console view as well as the logging/parameter subsystems. A lot of the time we modify firmware, flash it and want to tweak (via parameters) or to check if the changes are working as expected (via the console or logging). Then switching from the terminal, where we build/flash, to the Qt UI in the Crazyflie python client can be a hassle if you just want to do something quick. It would be great to be able to log/set variables directly from the terminal, well now you can!
Meet the Crazyflie command-line client, a fun Friday project I worked on a while back. The CLI is written in Rust and was made possible thanks to a previous fun Friday project by Arnaud on the Rust Crazyflie link/lib, which has now moved to the official Bitcraze repositories. The CLI project is still very limited, but has some basic functionality:
Scan for Crazyflies and pre-select one to interact with
List loggable variables, create log configurations and print their value
List parameters and get/set them
Show the Crazyflie console
Last week the first version, v0.1.0, was released on crates.io. So if you have Rust set up on your computer and want to test it out then all you need to do is to type “cargo install cfcli“. The CLI still only has some basic functionality, but hopefully it can be expanded in the future with more useful things! Feel free to leave any issues or comments you might have on the Github page.
ROSCon is a developer’s conference that focuses entirely on the Robot Operating System (ROS), bringing together developers from around the globe to learn, discuss, and network. It serves as a space for ROS developers to explore the latest advancements, share their experiences, and collaborate on cutting-edge robotics projects. We attended ROSCon 2022 in Japan, and it was a fantastic experience. So when the opportunity came to participate again this year, we couldn’t pass it up! Not only is this a conference that’s been close to our hearts, this year it’s also close to the office: it’s merely a 3hours train ride away.
The 2024 edition is full of promises already, and we’re excited to be a part of it in several ways. We talked about how we helped out the diversity committee already, contributing to efforts that promote a more inclusive and diverse community within the robotics field. Moreover, we will have a booth there. We’ll be located at in Room 2, at booth 21. If you have trouble finding us, just listen closely to the sound of drones buzzing! ! We’ll be showcasing a live demo that’s still under construction. If you’re curious and want to know more about it, just keep an eye on our weekly blogposts to get an update once we finalize our plans.
In addition to being an exhibitor, we also have the honour of presenting a talk. Arnaud will be speaking on October 23 at 14:40 in Large Hall 4. His talk, titled “The Lighthouse Project: From Virtual Reality to Onboard Positioning for Robotics”, will dive into the Lighthouse system, as the title implies. He’ll explain how this technology, originally developed for virtual reality, is being adapted for onboard positioning in various types of robots.
We’re really looking forward to connecting with fellow developers, learning from the presentations, and sharing our own work with the community. If you’re attending ROSCon 2024, be sure to stop by Booth 21 and catch Arnaud’s talk—we can’t wait to see you there!
You might remember that at the beginning of this summer, we were invited to do a skill-learning session with the Crazyflie at the Robotics Developer Day 2024 (see this blog post) organized by The Construct. We showed the Crazyflie flying with the multi-ranger deck, capable of mapping the room in both simulation and the real world. Moreover, we demonstrated this with both manual control and autonomous wall-following. Since then, we wanted to make some improvements to the simulation. We now present an updated tutorial on how to do all of this yourself on your own machine.
This tutorial will focus on using the multi-ranger ROS 2 nodes for both mapping and wall-following in simulation first, before trying it out on the real thing. You will be able to tune settings to your specific environment in simulation first and then use exactly the same nodes in the real world. That is one of the main strengths of ROS, providing you with that flexibility.
We have made a video of what to expect of the tutorial, for which you should use this blogpost for the more detailed instructions.
Watch this video first and then again with the instructions below
What do you need first?
You’ll need to setup some things first on the PC and acquire hardware to follow this tutorial in full:
Gazebo Harmonic – Install via these instructions This is not the recommended Gazebo for humble but we will install the specific ROS bridge for this later. Just make sure that you don’t have gazebo classic installed on your machine.
Hardware
You’ll need to components at least of the STEM ranging bundle
If you have any different setup of your computer, it is okay as the demos should be simple enough to work, but, be prepared for some warning/error handling that this tutorial might have not covered.
Time to complete:
This is an approximation of how much time you need to complete this tutorial, depended on your skill level, but if you already have experience with both ROS 2/Gazebo and the Crazyflie it should take 1 hour.
If you have the Crazyflie for the first time, it would probably be a good idea to go through the getting started tutorial and connect to it with a CFclient with the Flowdeck and Multi-ranger deck attached as a sanity check if everything is working before jumping into ROS 2 and Gazebo.
Go to the ros2_ws workspace and build the packages
cd ~/crazyflie_mapping_demo/ros2_ws/
source /opt/ros/humble/setup.bash
colcon build --cmake-args -DBUILD_TESTING=ONCode language:JavaScript(javascript)
Building will take a few minutes. Especially Crazyswarm2 will show a lot of warnings and std_err, but unless the package build has ‘failed’, just ignore it for now until we have proposed a fix to that repository.
If the build of all the packages passes and non failed, please continue to the next step!
2. Simple mapping simulation
This section will explain how to create a simple 2D map of your environment using the multi-ranger. The ROS 2 package designed for this is specifically made for the multi-ranger, but it should be compatible with NAV2 if you’d like. However, for now, we’ll focus on a simple version without any localization inferred from the map.
Open up a terminal which needs to be sourced for both the gazebo model and the newly build ROS 2 packages:
If you get a ‘No such file or directory’ error on the model, try entering the full path in GZ_SIM_RESOURCE_PATH export.
Gazebo will start with the Crazyflie in the center. You can get a close-up of the Crazyflie by right-clicking it in the Entity tree and pressing ‘Move to’. You can also choose to follow it, but the camera tracking feature of Gazebo needs some tuning to track something as small as the Crazyflie. Additionally, you will see RVIZ starting with the map view and transforms preconfigured.
Open up another terminal, source the installed ROS 2 distro and open up the ROS 2 teleop keyboard node:
source /opt/ros/humble/setup.bash
ros2 run teleop_twist_keyboard teleop_twist_keyboard
Have the Crazyflie take off with ‘t’ on your keyboard, and rotate it around with the teleop instructions. In RVIZ you should see the map being created and the transform of the Crazyflie moving. You should be able to see this picture, and in this part of the video.
Screenshot of the Crazyflie in Gazebo generating a map with Teleop (video)
3. Simple mapping real world
Now that you got the gist of it, let’s move to the real Crazyflie!
First, if you have a different URI of the Crazyflie to connect to, first change the config file ‘crazyflie_real_crazyswarm2.yaml’ in the crazyflie_ros2_repository. This is a file that Crazyswarm2 uses to know to which Crazyflie to connect to.
Open up the config file in gedit or your favorite IDE like visual code:
and change the URI on this line specifically to the URI of your Crazyflie if necessary. Mind that you need to rebuild ros2_ws again to make sure that this has an effect.
Now launch the ROS launch of the simple mapper example for the real world Crazyflie.
Now open up another terminal, source ROS 2 and open up teleop:
source /opt/ros/humble/setup.bash
ros2 run teleop_twist_keyboard teleop_twist_keyboard
Same thing, have the Crazyflie take off with ‘t’, and control it with the instructions.
You should be able to see this on your screen, which you can also check with this part of the video.
Screen shot of the real Crazyflie mapping while being controlled with ROS 2 teleop (video)
Make the Crazyflie land again with ‘b’, and now you can close the ROS 2 node in the launch terminal with ctrl + c.
4. Wall following simulation
Previously, you needed to control the Crazyflie yourself to create the map, but what if you could let the Crazyflie do it on its own? The `crazyflie_ros2_multiranger` package includes a `crazyflie_ros2_multiranger_wall_following` node that uses laser ranges from the multi-ranger to perform autonomous wall-following. Then, you can just sit back and relax while the map is created for you!
Let’s first try it in simulation, so open up a terminal and source it if you haven’t already (see section of the Simple mapper simulation). Then launch the wall follower ROS 2 launch file:
Take off and wall following will go fully automatic. The simulated Crazyflie in Gazebo will fly forward, stop when it sees a wall with it’s forward range sensor and follow the wall on its left-hand side.
You’ll see on RVIZ2 when the full map is created like here below and this part of the tutorial video.
Screenshot of the simulated Crazyflie in Gazebo mapping will autonomously wall following (video)
You can stop the simulated Crazyflie by the following service call in another terminal that is sourced with ROS 2 humble.
ros2 service call /crazyflie/stop_wall_following std_srvs/srv/Trigger
The simulated Crazyflie will stop wall following and land. You can also just close the simulation, since nothing can happen here.
5. Wall following real world
Now that we have demonstrated that the wall-following works in simulation, we feel confident enough to try it in the real world this time! Make sure you have a fully charged battery, place the Crazyflie on the floor facing the direction you’d like the positive x-axis to be (which is also where it will fly first), and turn it on.
Make sure that you are flying with a room with clear defined walls and corners, or make something with cardboard such as a mini maze, but the current algorithm is optimized to just fly in a squarish room.
Source the ROS 2 workspace like previously and start up the wall follower launch file for the
Like the simulated Crazyflie, the real Crazyflie will take off automatically and automatically do wall following, so it is important that it is flying towards a wall. It should look like this screenshot, or you can check it with this part of the video.
The real crazyflie wall following autonomously while mapping the room (video).
Be careful here to not accidently run this script with the Crazyflie sitting on your desk!
If you’d like the Crazyflie to stop, don’t stop theROS2 nodes with ctrl-c, since it will continue flying until crash. It’s not like simulation unfortunately where you can close the environment and nothing will happen. Instead, use the ROS 2 service made for this in a different terminal:
ros2 service call /crazyflie_real/stop_wall_following std_srvs/srv/Trigger
Similar the real Crazyflie will stop wall following and land. Now you can close the ROS 2 terminals and turn off the crazyflie.
Next steps?
We don’t have any more demos to show but we can give you a list of suggestions of what you could try next! You could for instance have multiple Crazyflies mapping together like in the video shown here:
This uses the mapMergeForMultiRobotMapping-ROS2 external project, which is combined with Crazyswarm2 with this launch file gist. Just keep in mind that, currently, it would be better to use a global positioning system here, such as the Lighthouse positioning system used in the video. Also, if you’d like to try this out in simulation, you’ll need to ensure different namespaces for the Crazyflies, which the current simulation setup may not fully support.
Another idea is to connect the NAV2 stack instead of the simple mapper. There exists a couple of instructions on the Crazyswarm2 ROS2 tutorials so you can use those as reference. Check out the video below here.
Moreover, if you are having difficulties setting up your computer, I’d like to remind you that the skill-learning session we conducted for Robotics Developer Day was entirely done using a ROSject provided by The Construct, which also allows direct connection with the Crazyflie. The only requirement is that you can run Crazyswarm2 on your local machine, but that should be feasible. See the video of the original Robotics Developer Day skill-learning session here:
The last thing to know is that the ROS 2 nodes in this tutorial are running ‘offboard,’ so not on the Crazyflies themselves. However, do check out the Micro-ROS examples for the Crazyflie by Eprosima whenever you have the time and would like to challenge yourself with embedded development.
That’s it, folks! If you are running into any issues with this tutorial or want to bounce some cool ideas to try yourself, start a discussion thread on https://discussions.bitcraze.io/.
We are excited to announce the release of our new PID Tuning Guide! This guide is designed to help users understand and apply the basics of PID tuning within our ecosystem, making it easier to achieve stable and responsive flight for your Crazyflie. This guide is particularly useful if you’ve modified your drone, such as adding expansion decks or changing its motor and/or propeller configuration. While our default tuning is designed to work in a wide range of situations and configurations, fine-tuning your PID settings can enhance performance for your specific setup and flight profile.
Interface with tuning toolbox and plotter displaying the roll angle setpoint and the roll angle state estimate.
What’s in the guide?
The guide covers essential topics, including:
Fundamental PID Concepts: Understand the role of Proportional, Integral, and Derivative parameters in controlling your Crazyflie’s movements.
Step-by-Step Instructions: Learn how to set up your software, and use cfclient for tuning.
Practical Tuning Tips: Get insights on adjusting PID gains, using the tuning toolbox, and conducting safe manual flight tests.
Why this guide is useful
Even though this guide focuses on the basics, it provides a solid foundation for anyone new to PID tuning. Whether you’re using the Crazyflie 2.1, Crazyflie 2.0, or a custom-built quadcopter with the Crazyflie Bolt, this guide will help you:
Understand how PID controllers work and why they are important.
Use the cfclient for PID tuning within our ecosystem.
Safety first
We prioritize safety in our guide. Always secure your quadcopter in a safe environment, use protective gear, and configure an emergency stop on your controller to ensure a safe tuning process.
Get started with PID tuning today!
Ready to improve your quadcopter’s flight performance? Check out our PID Tuning Guide and start tuning.
Ever since we developed the new 47-17 propellers it’s been on our list to update the Crazyflie 2.1 kit. And finally it is here! While we were at it, we also updated the battery which is now 1 gram lighter with the same performance and capacity. These changes will improve the flight duration and thrust with up to 15%.
An assembled Crazyflie 2.1+
At the same time, we will discontinue the Crazyflie 2.1 as the Crazyflie 2.1+ replaces the 2.1. If you still need the old propeller, don’t worry, we will continue selling this.
Increasing prices
As with the rest of the world, we’re feeling the impact of inflation, and like many others, we’re having to make some adjustments to keep up with the rising costs. We’ve done our best to keep things steady, but in order for us to keep developing our products we’ve realized that a small price adjustment across our product line is necessary. So starting today, August 19th, you’ll notice a slight increase of up to 10% on our products.
For the upcoming Crazyflie 2.1 brushless we developed, together with a leading motor manufacturing brand, a brushless 08028 motor, targeting high quality and high efficiency. The 08 – stator size motors are usually optimized for high power output, to serve the FPV market, but we where aiming for high efficiency. This means fitting maximum amount of copper around the stator, lowering KV, thin stator lamination sheets and high quality dual ball-bearings.
Specification
Stator size: 08028 (8.4mm x 2.8mm)
Stator lamination sheets: 0.2mm
Motor KV: 10000
Internal resistance: 0.52 Ohm
Weight: 2.4g
Dual ball-bearing design, using high quality NSK or NMB brands.
1 mm shaft, 5 mm length
Matching propeller: Bitcraze 55-35mm
Peak current 1.8A, peak power 7.2W -> 30g thurst @ 4V (using 55-35)
Rated voltage: 4.2V
Together with the bitcraze 55-35 mm propeller we manage to achieve a system efficiency of over 5 W/g during hover, not to shabby. As a reference, FPV setups normally achieve around 2 W/g. This will bring the hover time for the Crazyflie 2.1 brushless, in the barebone configuration, a bit over 10 minutes.